A generalised model of judgment aggregation
نویسنده
چکیده
The new eld of judgment aggregation aims to merge many individual sets of judgments on logically interconnected propositions into a single collective set of judgments on these propositions. Judgment aggregation has commonly been studied using classical propositional logic, with a limited expressive power and a problematic representation of conditional statements (if P then Q) as material conditionals. In this methodological paper, I present a simple uni ed model of judgment aggregation in general logics. I show how many realistic decision problems can be represented in it. This includes decision problems expressed in languages of classical propositional logic, predicate logic (e.g. preference aggregation problems), modal or conditional logics, and some multi-valued or fuzzy logics. I provide a list of simple tools for working with general logics, and I prove impossibility results that generalise earlier theorems.
منابع مشابه
Judgment aggregation in general logics
Within social choice theory, the new field of judgment aggregation aims to merge many individual sets of judgments on logically interconnected propositions into a single collective set of judgments on these propositions. Commonly, judgment aggregation is studied using standard propositional logic, with a limited expressive power and a problematic representation of conditional statements (“if P ...
متن کاملJudgment aggregation: (im)possibility theorems
The aggregation of individual judgments over interrelated propositions is a newly arising eld of social choice theory. I introduce several independence conditions on judgment aggregation rules, each of which protects against a speci c type of manipulation by agenda setters or voters. I derive impossibility theorems whereby these independence conditions are incompatible with certain minimal req...
متن کاملArrow's theorem in judgment aggregation
In response to recent work on the aggregation of individual judgments on logically connected propositions into collective judgments, it is often asked whether judgment aggregation is a special case of Arrowian preference aggregation. We argue the opposite. After proving a general impossibility result on judgment aggregation, we construct an embedding of preference aggregation into judgment aggr...
متن کاملDecision framing in judgment aggregation
Judgment aggregation problems are language dependent in that they may be framed in different yet equivalent ways. We formalize this dependence via the notion of translation invariance, adopted from the philosophy of science, and we argue for its normative desirability. We show that in the canonical judgment aggregation model, no reasonable judgment aggregation functions are translation invarian...
متن کاملJudgment Aggregation in Dynamic Logic of Propositional Assignments
Judgment Aggregation studies how agents take a collective decision on a certain number of issues based on their individual opinions. In recent years, a line of research in Judgment Aggregation investigates how to model this framework within a logical calculus — usually designed ad hoc for this purpose. By contrast, in this thesis we show how it is possible to translate any aggregation problem f...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Social Choice and Welfare
دوره 28 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2007